← 返回列表
🔗 原文
Lean Launch Pad 2026 @ Stanford – 经验教训演讲展示
Lean Launch Pad 2026 @ Stanford – Lessons Learned Presentations

Lean Launch Pad 2026 @ Stanford – Lessons Learned Presentations

We just finished the 16th annual Lean LaunchPad class at Stanford.

In those 16 years, the class has gone from a radical idea – that the Lean method could provide a more productive framework for new startups – to something that everyone agrees is a way to build new startups.

The class had gotten so popular that in 2021 we started teaching it in both the winter and spring sessions.

During the 2026 spring quarter the eight teams spoke to 978 potential customers, beneficiaries and regulators. Most students spent 15-20 hours a week on the class, about double that of a normal class.

This Class Launched a Revolution in Teaching Entreprenurship – AI Is Changing It
This class was designed to break out of “how to write a business plan” as the capstone of entrepreneurial education. A business plan assumed that all startups needed to do was to write a plan, raise money and then execute the plan. We overturned that orthodoxy when we pointed out that while existing organizations execute business models, startups search for them. And that a startup was a temporary organization designed to search for a repeatable and scaleable business model. This class was designed to teach startups how to search for a business model. I’ll summarize some of the learnings about the use of AI at the end of this post.

Several government-funded programs have adopted this class at scale. The first was in 2011 when we turned this syllabus into the curriculum for the National Science Foundation I-Corps. Errol Arkilic, the then head of commercialization at the National Science Foundation, adopted the class saying, “You’ve developed the scientific method for startups, using the Business Model Canvas as the laboratory notebook.” Now in its second decade and in 100+ universities, I-Corps has become a standard for science commercialization at the NSF, National Institutes of Health and the Department of Energy –  training 3,251 teams and launching 1,400+ startups to date.

Team Office Hours

If you can’t see the Team Office Hours video click here

If you can’t see the Team Office hours slides click here

If you can’t see a demo of the Team Office Hours app click here

Design of This Class
While the Lean LaunchPad students are experiencing what appears to them to be a fully hands-on, experiential class, it’s a carefully designed illusion. In fact, it’s highly structured. The syllabus has been designed so that we are offering continual implicit guidance, structure, and repetition. This is a critical distinction between our class and an open-ended experiential class.

Guidance, Direction and Structure – For example, students start the class with their own initial guidance – they believe they have an idea for a product or service (Lean LaunchPad/I-Corps) or have been given a clear real-world problem (Hacking for Defense). Coming into the class, students believe their goal is to validate their commercialization or deployment hypotheses. (The teaching team knows that over the course of the class, students will discover that most of their initial hypotheses are incorrect.)

Team Izhaar

If you can’t see the Team Izhaar click here

If you can’t see the Team Izhaar presentation click here

Team Trained on Me

If you can’t see the Team Trained on Me video click here

If you can’t see the Team Trained on Me presentation click here

The Business Model Canvas
The business model / mission model canvas offers students guidance, explicit direction, and structure. First, the canvas offers a complete, visual roadmap of all the hypotheses they will need to test over the entire class. Second, the canvas helps the students goal-seek by visualizing what an optimal endpoint would look like – finding product/market fit. Finally, the canvas provides students with a map of what they learn week-to-week through their customer discovery work. I can’t overemphasize the important role of the canvas. Unlike an incubator or accelerator with no frame, the canvas acts as the connective tissue – the frame – that students can fall back on if they get lost or confused. It allows us to teach the theory of how to turn an idea, need, or problem into commercial practice, week by week a piece at a time.

Team Artemis

If you can’t see the Team Artemis video click here

If you can’t see the Team Artemis presentation click here

Lean LaunchPad Tools
The tools for customer discovery (videos, sample experiments, etc.) offer guidance and structure for students to work outside the classroom. The explicit goal of 10-15 customer interviews a week along with the requirement for building a continual series of minimal viable products provides metrics that track the team’s progress. The mandatory office hours with the instructors and support from mentors provide additional guidance and structure.

Team Remainder

If you can’t see the Team Remainder video click here

If you can’t see the Team Remainder slides click here

Team Microprint

If you can’t see the Team Microprint video click here

If you can’t see the Team Microprint slides click here

Team Vital Health

If you can’t see the team Vital Health video click here

If you can’t see the team Vital Health presentation click here

Team Nimbus

If you can’t see the Team Nimbus video click here

If you can’t see the Team Nimbus presentation click here

AI In the Classroom

AI Embedded in the Class
This was the first year where all teams used AI to help create their business model canvas, build working MVPs in hours, generate customer questions, analyze and summarizing interviews.

AI has had some obvious and not so obvious impacts on our class.
First, here’s a summary of how our students used AI in both classes I taught this quarter.

If you can’t see the AI Use In Class slide click here

AI Tools Used
Claude + Granola – were the AI tools used by everyone.
Large Language Models Used
– Claude, Claude Code, Claude Chrome extension, Claude Cowork, Claude Design
– ChatGPT
Gemini
Note taking
Granola
Twinmind
Presentations
– Perplexity
Building prototypes
Replit
Lovable
Creating Synthetic Users
Listen Labs
Viewpoints AI
Summarizing Research
Google NotebookLM
Notion + G Suite (not strictly AI, but used as part of AI workflows)
Other
Ultralytics YOLOv8 (used by the SwarmShield H4D team for drone detection/tracking MVP)

AI Classroom Usage
Three of our students did a tutorial of how they used AI in the classroom.

If you can’t see the AI Classroom Usage tutorial click here

Impact of AI in the Classroom
The obvious and positive changes of AI were that teams were able to do customer discovery more efficiently. The not so obvious change was that creating products rapidly allowed teams to make bad ideas go faster. In the past, MVPs were a sign of a teams technical competence, but now spinning up something in hours that previously took weeks, means that an MVP is no longer evidence of critical thinking and hypothesis testing.

This meant student learning was unbalanced. A finished-looking product felt like success. Students confused a polished deliverable with the need to deeply understand the needs of all the stakeholders, as well as the need for Customer Validation. Team understanding was less nuanced. There was less depth uniformly across the teams about the problem they were solving and understanding customer needs. In this class it wasn’t the AI that was hallucinating –  it was teams. They pivoted late as they assumed that a polished product meant product/market fit.

Going forward we’ll have students come into class with a prototype but next time accompanied by the explicit hypotheses and experiments they’ll use to validate whether the prototype solved an actual problem.

On the other hand, students built some amazing Claude Skills and Gemini Gems. They were tons of untapped opportunities to build digital twins or test 10’s or 100’s of apps simultaneously.

More about this in a separate blog post.

It Takes A Village
While I authored this blog post, this class is a team project. The secret sauce of the success of Lean LaunchPad at Stanford is the extraordinary group of dedicated volunteers supporting our students in so many critical ways.

The teaching team consisted of myself and:

  • Steve Weinstein, partner at America’s Frontier Fund, 30-year veteran of Silicon Valley technology companies and Hollywood media companies. Steve was CEO of MovieLabs, the joint R&D lab of the major motion picture studios.
  • Lee Redden – CTO and co-founder of Blue River Technology (acquired by John Deere) who was a student in the first Lean LaunchPad class 14 years ago! I wrote a post about Lee’s journey here.
  • Jennifer Carolan, Co-Founder, Partner at Reach Capital the leading education VC and author of the Hacking for Education class.

Our teaching assistants this year were: Roya Meykadeh, Aditi Mahajan, Alina Hu.

The teams were assisted by mentors: David Kopp, Mitch Singer, Pradeep Jotwani, Dave Epstein, Anil Kamath, Bobby Mukherjee, Rekha Pai, Venkat Krisnamurthy and mentor team coordinator Todd Basche.

🤖 AI 总结
斯坦福第16届Lean LaunchPad课程完成,精益方法从激进理念转变为公认的创业构建方式。

Lean Launch Pad 2026 @ Stanford – Lessons Learned Presentations

We just finished the 16th annual Lean LaunchPad class at Stanford.

In those 16 years, the class has gone from a radical idea – that the Lean method could provide a more productive framework for new startups – to something that everyone agrees is a way to build new startups.

The class had gotten so popular that in 2021 we started teaching it in both the winter and spring sessions.

During the 2026 spring quarter the eight teams spoke to 978 potential customers, beneficiaries and regulators. Most students spent 15-20 hours a week on the class, about double that of a normal class.

This Class Launched a Revolution in Teaching Entreprenurship – AI Is Changing It
This class was designed to break out of “how to write a business plan” as the capstone of entrepreneurial education. A business plan assumed that all startups needed to do was to write a plan, raise money and then execute the plan. We overturned that orthodoxy when we pointed out that while existing organizations execute business models, startups search for them. And that a startup was a temporary organization designed to search for a repeatable and scaleable business model. This class was designed to teach startups how to search for a business model. I’ll summarize some of the learnings about the use of AI at the end of this post.

Several government-funded programs have adopted this class at scale. The first was in 2011 when we turned this syllabus into the curriculum for the National Science Foundation I-Corps. Errol Arkilic, the then head of commercialization at the National Science Foundation, adopted the class saying, “You’ve developed the scientific method for startups, using the Business Model Canvas as the laboratory notebook.” Now in its second decade and in 100+ universities, I-Corps has become a standard for science commercialization at the NSF, National Institutes of Health and the Department of Energy –  training 3,251 teams and launching 1,400+ startups to date.

Team Office Hours

If you can’t see the Team Office Hours video click here

If you can’t see the Team Office hours slides click here

If you can’t see a demo of the Team Office Hours app click here

Design of This Class
While the Lean LaunchPad students are experiencing what appears to them to be a fully hands-on, experiential class, it’s a carefully designed illusion. In fact, it’s highly structured. The syllabus has been designed so that we are offering continual implicit guidance, structure, and repetition. This is a critical distinction between our class and an open-ended experiential class.

Guidance, Direction and Structure – For example, students start the class with their own initial guidance – they believe they have an idea for a product or service (Lean LaunchPad/I-Corps) or have been given a clear real-world problem (Hacking for Defense). Coming into the class, students believe their goal is to validate their commercialization or deployment hypotheses. (The teaching team knows that over the course of the class, students will discover that most of their initial hypotheses are incorrect.)

Team Izhaar

If you can’t see the Team Izhaar click here

If you can’t see the Team Izhaar presentation click here

Team Trained on Me

If you can’t see the Team Trained on Me video click here

If you can’t see the Team Trained on Me presentation click here

The Business Model Canvas
The business model / mission model canvas offers students guidance, explicit direction, and structure. First, the canvas offers a complete, visual roadmap of all the hypotheses they will need to test over the entire class. Second, the canvas helps the students goal-seek by visualizing what an optimal endpoint would look like – finding product/market fit. Finally, the canvas provides students with a map of what they learn week-to-week through their customer discovery work. I can’t overemphasize the important role of the canvas. Unlike an incubator or accelerator with no frame, the canvas acts as the connective tissue – the frame – that students can fall back on if they get lost or confused. It allows us to teach the theory of how to turn an idea, need, or problem into commercial practice, week by week a piece at a time.

Team Artemis

If you can’t see the Team Artemis video click here

If you can’t see the Team Artemis presentation click here

Lean LaunchPad Tools
The tools for customer discovery (videos, sample experiments, etc.) offer guidance and structure for students to work outside the classroom. The explicit goal of 10-15 customer interviews a week along with the requirement for building a continual series of minimal viable products provides metrics that track the team’s progress. The mandatory office hours with the instructors and support from mentors provide additional guidance and structure.

Team Remainder

If you can’t see the Team Remainder video click here

If you can’t see the Team Remainder slides click here

Team Microprint

If you can’t see the Team Microprint video click here

If you can’t see the Team Microprint slides click here

Team Vital Health

If you can’t see the team Vital Health video click here

If you can’t see the team Vital Health presentation click here

Team Nimbus

If you can’t see the Team Nimbus video click here

If you can’t see the Team Nimbus presentation click here

AI In the Classroom

AI Embedded in the Class
This was the first year where all teams used AI to help create their business model canvas, build working MVPs in hours, generate customer questions, analyze and summarizing interviews.

AI has had some obvious and not so obvious impacts on our class.
First, here’s a summary of how our students used AI in both classes I taught this quarter.

If you can’t see the AI Use In Class slide click here

AI Tools Used
Claude + Granola – were the AI tools used by everyone.
Large Language Models Used
– Claude, Claude Code, Claude Chrome extension, Claude Cowork, Claude Design
– ChatGPT
Gemini
Note taking
Granola
Twinmind
Presentations
– Perplexity
Building prototypes
Replit
Lovable
Creating Synthetic Users
Listen Labs
Viewpoints AI
Summarizing Research
Google NotebookLM
Notion + G Suite (not strictly AI, but used as part of AI workflows)
Other
Ultralytics YOLOv8 (used by the SwarmShield H4D team for drone detection/tracking MVP)

AI Classroom Usage
Three of our students did a tutorial of how they used AI in the classroom.

If you can’t see the AI Classroom Usage tutorial click here

Impact of AI in the Classroom
The obvious and positive changes of AI were that teams were able to do customer discovery more efficiently. The not so obvious change was that creating products rapidly allowed teams to make bad ideas go faster. In the past, MVPs were a sign of a teams technical competence, but now spinning up something in hours that previously took weeks, means that an MVP is no longer evidence of critical thinking and hypothesis testing.

This meant student learning was unbalanced. A finished-looking product felt like success. Students confused a polished deliverable with the need to deeply understand the needs of all the stakeholders, as well as the need for Customer Validation. Team understanding was less nuanced. There was less depth uniformly across the teams about the problem they were solving and understanding customer needs. In this class it wasn’t the AI that was hallucinating –  it was teams. They pivoted late as they assumed that a polished product meant product/market fit.

Going forward we’ll have students come into class with a prototype but next time accompanied by the explicit hypotheses and experiments they’ll use to validate whether the prototype solved an actual problem.

On the other hand, students built some amazing Claude Skills and Gemini Gems. They were tons of untapped opportunities to build digital twins or test 10’s or 100’s of apps simultaneously.

More about this in a separate blog post.

It Takes A Village
While I authored this blog post, this class is a team project. The secret sauce of the success of Lean LaunchPad at Stanford is the extraordinary group of dedicated volunteers supporting our students in so many critical ways.

The teaching team consisted of myself and:

  • Steve Weinstein, partner at America’s Frontier Fund, 30-year veteran of Silicon Valley technology companies and Hollywood media companies. Steve was CEO of MovieLabs, the joint R&D lab of the major motion picture studios.
  • Lee Redden – CTO and co-founder of Blue River Technology (acquired by John Deere) who was a student in the first Lean LaunchPad class 14 years ago! I wrote a post about Lee’s journey here.
  • Jennifer Carolan, Co-Founder, Partner at Reach Capital the leading education VC and author of the Hacking for Education class.

Our teaching assistants this year were: Roya Meykadeh, Aditi Mahajan, Alina Hu.

The teams were assisted by mentors: David Kopp, Mitch Singer, Pradeep Jotwani, Dave Epstein, Anil Kamath, Bobby Mukherjee, Rekha Pai, Venkat Krisnamurthy and mentor team coordinator Todd Basche.

原文
Lean Launch Pad 2026 @ Stanford – Lessons Learned Presentations

Lean Launch Pad 2026 @ Stanford – Lessons Learned Presentations

We just finished the 16th annual Lean LaunchPad class at Stanford.

In those 16 years, the class has gone from a radical idea – that the Lean method could provide a more productive framework for new startups – to something that everyone agrees is a way to build new startups.

The class had gotten so popular that in 2021 we started teaching it in both the winter and spring sessions.

During the 2026 spring quarter the eight teams spoke to 978 potential customers, beneficiaries and regulators. Most students spent 15-20 hours a week on the class, about double that of a normal class.

This Class Launched a Revolution in Teaching Entreprenurship – AI Is Changing It
This class was designed to break out of “how to write a business plan” as the capstone of entrepreneurial education. A business plan assumed that all startups needed to do was to write a plan, raise money and then execute the plan. We overturned that orthodoxy when we pointed out that while existing organizations execute business models, startups search for them. And that a startup was a temporary organization designed to search for a repeatable and scaleable business model. This class was designed to teach startups how to search for a business model. I’ll summarize some of the learnings about the use of AI at the end of this post.

Several government-funded programs have adopted this class at scale. The first was in 2011 when we turned this syllabus into the curriculum for the National Science Foundation I-Corps. Errol Arkilic, the then head of commercialization at the National Science Foundation, adopted the class saying, “You’ve developed the scientific method for startups, using the Business Model Canvas as the laboratory notebook.” Now in its second decade and in 100+ universities, I-Corps has become a standard for science commercialization at the NSF, National Institutes of Health and the Department of Energy –  training 3,251 teams and launching 1,400+ startups to date.

Team Office Hours

If you can’t see the Team Office Hours video click here

If you can’t see the Team Office hours slides click here

If you can’t see a demo of the Team Office Hours app click here

Design of This Class
While the Lean LaunchPad students are experiencing what appears to them to be a fully hands-on, experiential class, it’s a carefully designed illusion. In fact, it’s highly structured. The syllabus has been designed so that we are offering continual implicit guidance, structure, and repetition. This is a critical distinction between our class and an open-ended experiential class.

Guidance, Direction and Structure – For example, students start the class with their own initial guidance – they believe they have an idea for a product or service (Lean LaunchPad/I-Corps) or have been given a clear real-world problem (Hacking for Defense). Coming into the class, students believe their goal is to validate their commercialization or deployment hypotheses. (The teaching team knows that over the course of the class, students will discover that most of their initial hypotheses are incorrect.)

Team Izhaar

If you can’t see the Team Izhaar click here

If you can’t see the Team Izhaar presentation click here

Team Trained on Me

If you can’t see the Team Trained on Me video click here

If you can’t see the Team Trained on Me presentation click here

The Business Model Canvas
The business model / mission model canvas offers students guidance, explicit direction, and structure. First, the canvas offers a complete, visual roadmap of all the hypotheses they will need to test over the entire class. Second, the canvas helps the students goal-seek by visualizing what an optimal endpoint would look like – finding product/market fit. Finally, the canvas provides students with a map of what they learn week-to-week through their customer discovery work. I can’t overemphasize the important role of the canvas. Unlike an incubator or accelerator with no frame, the canvas acts as the connective tissue – the frame – that students can fall back on if they get lost or confused. It allows us to teach the theory of how to turn an idea, need, or problem into commercial practice, week by week a piece at a time.

Team Artemis

If you can’t see the Team Artemis video click here

If you can’t see the Team Artemis presentation click here

Lean LaunchPad Tools
The tools for customer discovery (videos, sample experiments, etc.) offer guidance and structure for students to work outside the classroom. The explicit goal of 10-15 customer interviews a week along with the requirement for building a continual series of minimal viable products provides metrics that track the team’s progress. The mandatory office hours with the instructors and support from mentors provide additional guidance and structure.

Team Remainder

If you can’t see the Team Remainder video click here

If you can’t see the Team Remainder slides click here

Team Microprint

If you can’t see the Team Microprint video click here

If you can’t see the Team Microprint slides click here

Team Vital Health

If you can’t see the team Vital Health video click here

If you can’t see the team Vital Health presentation click here

Team Nimbus

If you can’t see the Team Nimbus video click here

If you can’t see the Team Nimbus presentation click here

AI In the Classroom

AI Embedded in the Class
This was the first year where all teams used AI to help create their business model canvas, build working MVPs in hours, generate customer questions, analyze and summarizing interviews.

AI has had some obvious and not so obvious impacts on our class.
First, here’s a summary of how our students used AI in both classes I taught this quarter.

If you can’t see the AI Use In Class slide click here

AI Tools Used
Claude + Granola – were the AI tools used by everyone.
Large Language Models Used
– Claude, Claude Code, Claude Chrome extension, Claude Cowork, Claude Design
– ChatGPT
Gemini
Note taking
Granola
Twinmind
Presentations
– Perplexity
Building prototypes
Replit
Lovable
Creating Synthetic Users
Listen Labs
Viewpoints AI
Summarizing Research
Google NotebookLM
Notion + G Suite (not strictly AI, but used as part of AI workflows)
Other
Ultralytics YOLOv8 (used by the SwarmShield H4D team for drone detection/tracking MVP)

AI Classroom Usage
Three of our students did a tutorial of how they used AI in the classroom.

If you can’t see the AI Classroom Usage tutorial click here

Impact of AI in the Classroom
The obvious and positive changes of AI were that teams were able to do customer discovery more efficiently. The not so obvious change was that creating products rapidly allowed teams to make bad ideas go faster. In the past, MVPs were a sign of a teams technical competence, but now spinning up something in hours that previously took weeks, means that an MVP is no longer evidence of critical thinking and hypothesis testing.

This meant student learning was unbalanced. A finished-looking product felt like success. Students confused a polished deliverable with the need to deeply understand the needs of all the stakeholders, as well as the need for Customer Validation. Team understanding was less nuanced. There was less depth uniformly across the teams about the problem they were solving and understanding customer needs. In this class it wasn’t the AI that was hallucinating –  it was teams. They pivoted late as they assumed that a polished product meant product/market fit.

Going forward we’ll have students come into class with a prototype but next time accompanied by the explicit hypotheses and experiments they’ll use to validate whether the prototype solved an actual problem.

On the other hand, students built some amazing Claude Skills and Gemini Gems. They were tons of untapped opportunities to build digital twins or test 10’s or 100’s of apps simultaneously.

More about this in a separate blog post.

It Takes A Village
While I authored this blog post, this class is a team project. The secret sauce of the success of Lean LaunchPad at Stanford is the extraordinary group of dedicated volunteers supporting our students in so many critical ways.

The teaching team consisted of myself and:

  • Steve Weinstein, partner at America’s Frontier Fund, 30-year veteran of Silicon Valley technology companies and Hollywood media companies. Steve was CEO of MovieLabs, the joint R&D lab of the major motion picture studios.
  • Lee Redden – CTO and co-founder of Blue River Technology (acquired by John Deere) who was a student in the first Lean LaunchPad class 14 years ago! I wrote a post about Lee’s journey here.
  • Jennifer Carolan, Co-Founder, Partner at Reach Capital the leading education VC and author of the Hacking for Education class.

Our teaching assistants this year were: Roya Meykadeh, Aditi Mahajan, Alina Hu.

The teams were assisted by mentors: David Kopp, Mitch Singer, Pradeep Jotwani, Dave Epstein, Anil Kamath, Bobby Mukherjee, Rekha Pai, Venkat Krisnamurthy and mentor team coordinator Todd Basche.

中文翻译
Lean Launch Pad 2026 @ Stanford – 经验教训演讲展示

精益启动台2026 @ 斯坦福 – 经验教训汇报

我们刚刚在斯坦福完成了第16届年度精益启动台课程。

在这16年中,这门课程从一个激进的想法——即精益方法可以为新创业公司提供一个更具生产力的框架——演变为大家公认的构建新创业公司的一种方式。

这门课程变得如此受欢迎,以至于我们在2021年开始在冬季和春季学期都进行教学。

在2026年春季学期,八个团队与978位潜在客户、受益者和监管者进行了交流。大多数学生每周在这门课上花费15-20小时,大约是普通课程的两倍。

这门课在创业教育中发起了一场革命——AI正在改变它
这门课旨在打破“如何撰写商业计划书”作为创业教育顶点的传统。商业计划书假设所有创业公司需要做的就是写计划、筹集资金然后执行计划。我们推翻了这一正统观念,指出现有组织是执行商业模式,而创业公司是寻找商业模式。创业公司是一个临时组织,旨在寻找可重复且可扩展的商业模式。这门课旨在教创业公司如何寻找商业模式。我将在本文末尾总结一些关于AI使用的经验教训。

多个政府资助项目已大规模采用这门课程。第一次是在2011年,我们将这个教学大纲转化为美国国家科学基金会I-Corps的课程。Errol Arkilic,当时美国国家科学基金会商业化负责人,采用了这门课,他说:“你们为创业公司开发了科学方法,将商业模式画布用作实验室笔记本。”现在,I-Corps已进入第二个十年,在100多所大学中,已成为美国国家科学基金会、美国国立卫生研究院和能源部的科学商业化标准——迄今已培训了3,251个团队,孵化出1,400多家创业公司。

团队办公时间

如果看不到团队办公时间视频,请点击此处

如果看不到团队办公时间幻灯片,请点击此处

如果看不到团队办公时间应用的演示,请点击此处

这门课的设计
尽管精益启动台的学生们体验到的似乎是一门完全动手、体验式的课程,但这其实是一个精心设计的假象。事实上,它结构非常严谨。教学大纲的设计使我们提供持续的内在指导、结构和重复。这是我们课程与开放式体验课程之间的关键区别。

指导、方向和结构 – 例如,学生们带着自己的初始指导开始课程——他们相信自己有一个产品或服务的创意(精益启动台/I-Corps)或者被赋予了一个明确的现实世界问题(为了国防而黑入)。进入课程时,学生们相信他们的目标是验证他们的商业化或部署假设。(教学团队知道,在课程过程中,学生们会发现他们最初的大多数假设都是错误的。)

团队Izhaar

如果看不到团队Izhaar视频,请点击此处

如果看不到团队Izhaar汇报,请点击此处

团队Trained on Me

如果看不到团队Trained on Me视频,请点击此处

如果看不到团队Trained on Me汇报,请点击此处

商业模式画布
商业模式 / 使命模型画布为学生提供指导、明确方向和结构。首先,画布提供了他们需要在整门课程中测试的所有假设的完整视觉路线图。其次,画布通过可视化最佳终点的样子——即找到产品/市场契合——来帮助学生寻求目标。最后,画布为学生提供了他们通过客户发现工作每周所学内容的地图。我无论如何强调画布的重要作用都不为过。与没有框架的孵化器或加速器不同,画布充当了连接组织——框架——学生在迷失或困惑时可以依靠它。它使我们能够教授如何将一个想法、需求或问题转变为商业实践的理论,每周一点一点地进行。

团队Artemis

如果看不到团队Artemis视频,请点击此处

如果看不到团队Artemis汇报,请点击此处

精益启动台工具
客户发现工具(视频、示例实验等)为学生提供了课堂外工作的指导和结构。每周10-15次客户访谈的明确目标,以及构建一系列持续的最小可行产品的要求,提供了跟踪团队进展的指标。与导师的强制性办公时间以及来自顾问的支持,提供了额外的指导和结构。

团队Remainder

如果看不到团队Remainder视频,请点击此处

如果看不到团队Remainder幻灯片,请点击此处

团队Microprint

如果看不到团队Microprint视频,请点击此处

如果看不到团队Microprint幻灯片,请点击此处

团队Vital Health

如果看不到团队Vital Health视频,请点击此处

如果看不到团队Vital Health汇报,请点击此处

团队Nimbus

如果看不到团队Nimbus视频,请点击此处

如果看不到团队Nimbus汇报,请点击此处

课堂中的AI

嵌入课程的AI
这是第一年所有团队都使用AI来帮助创建他们的商业模式画布、在几小时内构建可用的MVP、生成客户问题、分析和总结访谈。

AI对我们的课程产生了一些明显和不那么明显的影响。
首先,这里总结了我的学生在本季度我教授的两门课程中使用AI的方式。

如果看不到AI课堂使用幻灯片,请点击此处

使用的AI工具
Claude + Granola – 是所有人使用的AI工具。
使用的大语言模型
– Claude, Claude Code, Claude Chrome扩展, Claude Cowork, Claude Design
– ChatGPT
Gemini
笔记记录
Granola
Twinmind
演示文稿
– Perplexity
构建原型
Replit
Lovable
创建合成用户
Listen Labs
Viewpoints AI
总结研究
Google NotebookLM
Notion + G Suite (不完全是AI,但用作AI工作流程的一部分)
其他
Ultralytics YOLOv8 (由SwarmShield H4D团队用于无人机检测/跟踪MVP)

AI课堂使用
我们的三名学生做了一个关于他们如何在课堂中使用AI的教程。

如果看不到AI课堂使用教程,请点击此处

AI在课堂中的影响
AI带来的明显积极变化是团队能够更高效地进行客户发现。不那么明显的变化是,快速创建产品使得团队能够更快地实施糟糕的想法。过去,MVP是团队技术能力的标志,但现在在几小时内就能完成过去需要几周的工作,意味着MVP不再是批判性思维和假设测试的证据。

这意味着学生的学习是不平衡的。一个看起来完成的产品会让人感觉成功。学生们将精美的交付物误认为是深入理解所有利益相关者需求以及客户验证的需求。团队的理解缺乏细微差别。各个团队在解决问题的深度和对客户需求的理解上普遍不足。在这门课上,不是AI在产生幻觉——而是团队自身。他们过晚地转变方向,因为他们认为一个精美的产品就意味着产品/市场契合。

今后,我们将让学生带着原型进入课堂,但下一次还要附带明确的假设和实验,他们用来验证原型是否解决了实际问题。

另一方面,学生们构建了一些令人惊叹的Claude Skills和Gemini Gems。还有大量未开发的机遇,可以构建数字孪生或同时测试数十甚至数百个应用。

更多内容将在另一篇博客文章中介绍。

众人拾柴火焰高
虽然这篇博文由我撰写,但这门课是一个团队项目。斯坦福精益启动台成功的秘诀是一群非凡的、敬业的志愿者,他们在许多关键方面支持我们的学生。

教学团队由我和以下人员组成:

  • Steve Weinstein, America’s Frontier Fund合伙人,拥有30年硅谷科技公司和好莱坞媒体公司从业经验。Steve曾担任六大电影制片厂联合研发实验室MovieLabs的CEO。
  • Lee Redden – Blue River Technology的CTO兼联合创始人(被John Deere收购),他是14年前首届精益启动台课程的学生!我写过一篇关于Lee历程的文章,可点击此处阅读。
  • Jennifer Carolan,Reach Capital的联合创始人、合伙人,该基金是领先的教育风投,也是"为了教育而黑入"课程的作者。

我们今年的助教是:Roya Meykadeh, Aditi Mahajan, Alina Hu。

团队得到了顾问们的协助:David Kopp, Mitch Singer, Pradeep Jotwani, Dave Epstein, Anil Kamath, Bobby Mukherjee, Rekha Pai, Venkat Krisnamurthy,以及顾问团队协调员Todd Basche。