← 返回列表
🔗 原文
演示BMS故障情况下LFP电池的安全性
Demonstrating LFP Battery Safety in Case of BMS Failure

Generally, LiFePO4 (LFP) batteries are quite safe and stable, but it’s still possible for something to go wrong, even something catastrophic, like the battery management system (BMS) developing a direct short. This is one of the tests required to be certified for the UL 2054 standard that targets household and portable battery safety. In a recent series of videos, [Will Prowse] demonstrates how a series of commercial batteries pass these tests, and how some still fail.

This particular short-circuit test is quite demanding, as it requires that this failure condition is immediately detected and some kind of fail-safe mechanism – like a fuse – kicks in. The first two batteries easily pass this test by blowing their fuse, just as you expect. Interestingly, the second unit here isn’t even UL-listed but comes with multiple layers of safety.

The third unit shown is a ‘Li Time’ LFP battery akin to what you’d purchase off a random online retailer’s website. This battery features the typical basic BMS and battery configuration, but is missing a chunky, prominently placed fuse. ‘LiTime’ also claims to be UL 2054 certified. The problem with this claim is that there is no fuse to prevent a thermal runaway event if the BMS were to short.

The final battery tested is made by Battle Born, and it also had issues.  [Will’s] testing shows the battery catches fire as its purported thermal safety does extremely little to interrupt the current.

The takeaway from this demonstration is that you should look for safety features such as internal fuses. It’s also worth it to add terminal fuses to batteries to potentially interrupt dangerous currents at those points. Better to replace a blown fuse than to deal with an out-of-control inferno and/or violent hydrogen detonation.

🤖 AI 总结
LFP电池虽安全稳定,但BMS故障仍可能引发灾难性后果,需警惕其失效风险。

Generally, LiFePO4 (LFP) batteries are quite safe and stable, but it’s still possible for something to go wrong, even something catastrophic, like the battery management system (BMS) developing a direct short. This is one of the tests required to be certified for the UL 2054 standard that targets household and portable battery safety. In a recent series of videos, [Will Prowse] demonstrates how a series of commercial batteries pass these tests, and how some still fail.

This particular short-circuit test is quite demanding, as it requires that this failure condition is immediately detected and some kind of fail-safe mechanism – like a fuse – kicks in. The first two batteries easily pass this test by blowing their fuse, just as you expect. Interestingly, the second unit here isn’t even UL-listed but comes with multiple layers of safety.

The third unit shown is a ‘Li Time’ LFP battery akin to what you’d purchase off a random online retailer’s website. This battery features the typical basic BMS and battery configuration, but is missing a chunky, prominently placed fuse. ‘LiTime’ also claims to be UL 2054 certified. The problem with this claim is that there is no fuse to prevent a thermal runaway event if the BMS were to short.

The final battery tested is made by Battle Born, and it also had issues.  [Will’s] testing shows the battery catches fire as its purported thermal safety does extremely little to interrupt the current.

The takeaway from this demonstration is that you should look for safety features such as internal fuses. It’s also worth it to add terminal fuses to batteries to potentially interrupt dangerous currents at those points. Better to replace a blown fuse than to deal with an out-of-control inferno and/or violent hydrogen detonation.

原文
Demonstrating LFP Battery Safety in Case of BMS Failure

Generally, LiFePO4 (LFP) batteries are quite safe and stable, but it’s still possible for something to go wrong, even something catastrophic, like the battery management system (BMS) developing a direct short. This is one of the tests required to be certified for the UL 2054 standard that targets household and portable battery safety. In a recent series of videos, [Will Prowse] demonstrates how a series of commercial batteries pass these tests, and how some still fail.

This particular short-circuit test is quite demanding, as it requires that this failure condition is immediately detected and some kind of fail-safe mechanism – like a fuse – kicks in. The first two batteries easily pass this test by blowing their fuse, just as you expect. Interestingly, the second unit here isn’t even UL-listed but comes with multiple layers of safety.

The third unit shown is a ‘Li Time’ LFP battery akin to what you’d purchase off a random online retailer’s website. This battery features the typical basic BMS and battery configuration, but is missing a chunky, prominently placed fuse. ‘LiTime’ also claims to be UL 2054 certified. The problem with this claim is that there is no fuse to prevent a thermal runaway event if the BMS were to short.

The final battery tested is made by Battle Born, and it also had issues.  [Will’s] testing shows the battery catches fire as its purported thermal safety does extremely little to interrupt the current.

The takeaway from this demonstration is that you should look for safety features such as internal fuses. It’s also worth it to add terminal fuses to batteries to potentially interrupt dangerous currents at those points. Better to replace a blown fuse than to deal with an out-of-control inferno and/or violent hydrogen detonation.

中文翻译
演示BMS故障情况下LFP电池的安全性

一般来说,LiFePO4 (LFP) 电池相当安全且稳定,但仍然有可能出现问题,甚至是灾难性的问题,比如电池管理系统 (BMS) 发生直接短路。这是针对家用和便携式电池安全的 UL 2054 标准认证所需测试之一。在最近的一系列视频中,[Will Prowse] 演示了 一系列商用电池如何通过这些测试,以及某些电池如何 仍然未能通过

这项特定的短路测试要求非常严格,因为它要求立即检测到这种故障情况,并启动某种故障安全机制——比如保险丝。前两块电池很容易就通过了测试,它们按照预期熔断了保险丝。有趣的是,第二块电池甚至没有经过 UL 认证,但却配备了多层安全保护。

第三块展示的电池是 'Li Time' LFP 电池,类似于你从随机在线零售商网站上购买的那种。该电池采用典型的简单 BMS 和电池配置,但缺少一个既大又显眼的保险丝。'LiTime' 也声称通过了 UL 2054 认证。这个说法的问号在于,如果 BMS 发生短路,没有保险丝来防止热失控事件。

最后测试的电池由 Battle Born 制造,它也出了问题。[Will] 的测试显示,该电池起火,因为其 所谓的热安全措施 未能有效中断电流。

这次演示的结论是,你应该寻找诸如内部保险丝之类的安全特性。同时,为电池安装端子保险丝也值得考虑,以便在这些位置中断危险的电流。更换一个熔断的保险丝,总比处理失控的大火和/或剧烈的氢气爆炸要好。